If Queen Elizabeth posed nude on the cover of a magazine I'd be surprised.
There's nothing new or shocking about Kim Kardashian posing nude.
The problem is that, this time, in doing so Kim comes off like a hypocrite.
A few years ago, when Kim saw herself on the cover of W magazine she cried on national television and said, "I'm definitely not getting naked or taking my clothes off again, not even if it's Vogue..." because she appeared to look naked.
She's also spoken about how she regrets having posed for Playboy.
We're all entitled to change our minds. I do it all the time. However, those in the public eye must be aware of the fact that their every move is scrutinized—and she indubitably knows that.
As a single woman with no children I am no one to say how she should behave because she's a mother and a wife. And I could care less that she's naked.
But I would like to understand why she changed her mind about posing nude.
What motivated her?
Why do this now that she's a mother?
And lastly, how much was she paid?
Because, well, like it or not, Kim is a shrewd businesswoman. She definitely didn't do it for free.
-Evelisionvision
